Staffordshire Figures 1780-1840
  • Home
  • Books
  • Blog
  • Figures etc.
    • Some Fabulous Figures
    • Restoring Antique Staffordshire Pottery
    • Reproductions of Antique Staffordshire Pottery Figures
    • Believe It?
    • Dealers in Antique Staffordshire Pottery
    • Books on Staffordshire Pottery
    • Interesting Web Sites
  • Videos

Fatal Flaws

12/17/2017

0 Comments

 
One of my many personal imperfections is my almost total inability to recognize a face. This is rather embarrassing at times. Yes, I am that idiot who will be introduced to you three times in the same day. On the other hand, if you had bocage leaves attached to you, I would remember you immediately! Strangely,  when it comes to figures, my recall is remarkably good.  One little figure group that I remember crossing my path several times in recent years is that below.
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, Box Title Group
Hindsight is always 20:20, and, as I look at this group today, I ask myself whether the awkward positioning of the bocage should have raised a red flag. It is perched rather awkwardly, is it not?

Most importantly, the bocage on this group is an old bocage that, like the group, was made circa 1825. The problem is that the bocage was made by one pot bank (the Patriotic Group pot bank)  and the rest of the group was made by another (the Box Title Group pot bank). The two were united courtesy of a modern restorer. This is what the group should look like.  Much more balanced, don't you think?
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, Box Title Group
I first spotted the problem group in the stock of a UK dealer. I pointed out my concerns. Sure enough, he had discerned a join where the bocage had been professionally attached, but he had assumed that the correct bocage had snapped off and had been put back into place. When he realized that this was not so, he disposed of the group at auction. Ah, if only all dealers were as selective, so insistent on only selling what they know to be right.

Auctions are not for the unwary. They are sometimes said to be the places dealers send their mistakes, but they are also the places that dealers make mistakes. Sure enough, another dealer bought the mismatched group, and I stumbled across it yet again at a show in the US. Again, I pointed out the issue. This time the dealer's response was not quite as heart warming. "Well," he said, "if someone asks me, I will say that the bocage has been reattached." Hmm....THE bocage or A bocage??? 

The mismatched group surfaced again in a US collection shared on FaceBook recently. Mismatched figures are really not that common, but they are common enough that you should buy your figures from a dealer who can help you avoid this trap. The first one I encountered was a Walton figure of an apostle, with a transplanted Sherratt bocage.  Similarly, you can see a "Sherratt" bocage on a cow of the type that "Sherratt" never made. On the left is the mismatched bovine; on the right is a correct example.

Picture
Picture
Picture


​If you look behind the problem cow, the clumsy reattachment is quite apparent.
You can also see a bocage transplant on this little elephant.
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, elephant, Enoch Wood
In the case of the elephant, the first red flag might be the very obvious difference between the flowers on the base and those on the bocage--but it is conceivable that flowers differ. Remember though that elephants of this sort all seem to have been made by Enoch Wood, while the bocage here is a form commonly used by Ralph Salt and other potters. Looking carefully at the back, you can see the fault line where the bocage has been attached--but the wrong bocage.
Picture
The elephant should correctly look more like one of these.
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, elephant, Enoch Wood
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, elephant, Enoch Wood
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, elephant, Enoch Wood
Truth be told, the elephant in the middle too has a transplanted bocage, but it is an  Enoch Wood bocage. The restoration was done ethically and responsibly.On a good note, the elephant with the incorrect transplanted bocage sold honestly  to a fully informed buyer, but transparency is the exception rather than the rule in these cases. That doesn't mean that the trade is necessarily dishonest. Rather, it means that dealers don't always know. 

I am always reluctant to let a reattached bocage influence my decision on attribution. Case in point is the cottage below.
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, cottage, Sherratt
The bocage is definitely "Sherratt"--the problem is that the bocage is not original to the figure. I strongly suspected the cottage was "Sherratt," but, lacking strong proof and not wanting to be influenced by a reattached bocage, I did not include this cottage in Staffordshire Figures 1780-1840, Volume 4.

I have long suspected that "Sherratt" made the cottage below because the design on the base is very suggestive of "Sherratt"--but there are just not enough  features to confirm an attribution. 
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, cottage, Sherratt
And then you have the three cottage groups below. Sadly,  all have losses, and all have nothing pointing to an attribution. 
Picture
Courtesy the Collection of Arnold and Barbara Berlin
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, cottage, Sherratt
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, cottage, Sherratt
The cottage below provided an important clue in unravelling the vexing cottage riddle. Importantly, it has  a diminutive "turquoise bocage" of the type that only "Sherratt" used, and indeed the base is in that turquoise palette "Sherratt" liked. 
antiques Staffordshire figure, antique Staffordshire pottery, pearlware, bocage, Myrna Schkolne, cottage, Sherratt
I am comfortable attributing this cottage to "Sherratt," and it follows that the others are most likely to be "Sherratt" too.

​Details matter. Having the correct bocage on your figure impacts its integrity and value. As I wrote last month, be fully informed about condition when you buy a piece of early pottery. If the bocage has been reattached, make sure that the bocage is of the correct form--and preferably the original bocage. If in doubt, take time to ask me or check a book. And don't buy in haste lest you are forced to repent at your leisure.
0 Comments

Don't be a sucker...

12/3/2017

0 Comments

 
Recently, my adult son expressed his frustration with a colleague who had asked his advice but had failed to follow his recommendation. He thought this damaged their relationship and asked if I had felt the same way in similar situations. I had to laugh! "Steven," I replied, "try being a parent! My kids don't listen to me...yet I am still advising."  I added that I routinely give collectors guidance, but always with the caveat that my free opinion is only worth its price.

My feelings are not dented if collectors ignore my opinions. After all, why should my recommendation be worth anything?I usually tell them that I respect their right to make their own decisions, and whatever they decide we stay friends. But today,  I impart a pearl of wisdom that collectors ignore at immense peril: 

IF YOU FAIL TO ASK ABOUT CONDITION WHEN PURCHASING A FIGURE, YOU MAY BE A SUCKER, A FOOL JUST BEGGING TO BE PARTED FROM YOUR MONEY.

Don't get me wrong: I am not telling you to only buy perfect figures. I accept that many very desirable figures have some restoration or repair. On the other hand, some figures have extensive restoration or repair. As you fall in love with a figure, as your heart beats a little faster and you are overwhelmed with that warm glow of excitement, the condition may not matter to you at all. But believe me, if you ever want to sell that figure, condition will matter a lot. So when you purchase a figure, insist that the dealer note any restoration on the receipt. That way, you know what you have. There can be no confusion, no he-said or he-didn't- say.

Does this sound harsh? I mean it to be! Again and again, dealers tell me (sometimes in amazement, sometimes with a smirk) that collectors routinely buy without a single enquiry about condition. I am stunned! These "collectors" are the same individuals who caress and squeeze every piece of fruit in the supermarket before deciding on the perfect one....yet when it comes to a costly Staffordshire figure, they just point at it (or click the mouse) and buy. 

This begs the question: what kind of collection are you assembling if you care not about the integrity of the objects in it? If you just want pretty things, you can find plenty at a fraction of the price of an early Staffordshire figure. Is it that you prefer owning something old? I understand....but a heavily restored figure can be largely new!

Dear Collector, I believe a nice early Staffordshire figure warrants a fine price. On the other hand. a heavily restored example of that same figure is worth a whole lot less...but if we collectors fail to ask, what stops the trade pricing that heavily restored figure as if it were perfect?
​
If it is all about eye-candy for you and you don't care, go ahead. But when you want to sell your very restored figure some day, don't be surprised if you have great difficulty doing so.  

Two examples make my point: Recently, I viewed a private collection, which held the object below, bought years ago from a now-retired dealer with whom the collector had a long-standing and trusting relationship. The price ticket beneath indicated that it had changed hands for a substantial price. 
Picture
I told the collector that, sadly, his treasure was nigh valueless because it was missing critical components. Once upon a time, it looked like this.
Picture
The collector could not recall being told about any loss or damage to the object at the time he bought it. In truth, I am sure he didn't ask! He simply bought with misplaced trust. But, as Ronald Reagan cautioned, "Trust but verify."

My second example is this sweet little church that appeared on eBay a few months ago. It was honestly described as missing critical components, as you see in the picture below.
staffordshire pottery, antique Staffordshire figure, pearlware figure, christening, church, Myrna Schkolne
Because of its condition, there was no interest. It is the only known example and I was tormented at the thought of it being tossed. I just couldn't help myself, so I bid GBP45, against no competing bids.
​
The church is a petite little things, just 5" to the top of the steeple. The buidling itself was intact, and there never had been bocage leaves on those trees, but all the figures in the foreground were missing. Clearly, the back figure on the right had been a man because his lower trouser legs remained. Right next to him were two smaller feet that had to have belonged to a woman.  The figure on the far left had broken away entirely, leaving an oval patch that corresponds to the way a vicar’s coat might fall, so I deduced that this group was once a christening. This made the fourth missing figure (one largish foot remained) the clerk.

I added the group to my Wreck Collection, and I could have happily lived with it as it was--in fact, I preferred living with it as it was! But once it became mine, I felt responsible for its future...and I was haunted by the certainty of it being discarded at the end of my days. Restoring it, to my mind, added absolutely no value, but unrestored it would almost certainly be tossed. I couldn’t justify costly professional restoration, so I decided to have a shot at replacing the missing figures myself. The task was way above my very amateur pay grade. How was I to make the figures? Which figures should I try to copy? All except one christening group recorded to date are from the “Sherratt” pot bank, and the figures on it are much too large for this group. Also, “Sherratt” christenings have two women (the godmothers) rather than a man and woman, who I believed had stood to the right of the church originally.
​
The tiniest figures in our collection are the man and woman shown below. I made models from these figures in clay and tooled them to remove his hat (which in this case is lying on the ground) and her dog (which I replaced with a small handbag). I fired them in a little kiln, and, as expected, the clay shrank, making the figures about ten percent smaller than the originals. Next, I fitted them onto the base so as not to damage any original material. In other words, it would have been easier to remove the feet and legs remaining on the base to position my figures, but instead I removed the feet and legs from my figures and fitted them to the original body parts. The result looked reasonable, so I continued.

Picture
Next, I needed a clerk, and a friend came to the rescue with a  small clay clerk he had made. I removed one of the clerk's feet so that the figure fitted onto the original foot that remained on the base.

Lastly, I needed a vicar holding a baby. Again, my friend sent me a clay model of his vicar, but this presented great challenges because it was huge. Each time a figure is fired, there is shrinkage of about 10%, so I knew that I had to model another clay figure off the vicar, fire it, and keep repeating this process until the vicar was
  suitably petite. This took four very long iterations.
​

I spent an embarrassingly long time on this project, and, as I have very little experience and am far from artistic, the result could be improved,  but I learned a lot, and it would be better if I were to do it again--but that is NEVER happening! I show you the end result alongside a figure of a gardener, just so you can appreciate how very tiny this group is.
 
I hope that after my days this group passes to someone who is able to enjoy it despite its issues, and I also hope that a perfect example comes to light to enable correct restoration. My work is reversible; it did no harm to any original material. Above all, my task enhanced my appreciation of the enormous skills the potters had, as well as the skill and time required for professional restoration. 

Collectors who buy without asking about condition, who demand the cute above all else, who never want to see a flake or a nick on a figure, these collectors would love this little christening. It has all the elements that make it popular in today's market. Even restored, it should be worth no more than the GBP45 (plus shipping) that  I paid for it. But if collectors are not going to enquire about condition, what might a dealer ask for this unrecorded group?  GBP450? GBP4,500? 

Collectors, don't be suckers.  Restoration is a fact of life, but know what you are buying. Perfection should command a premium. Restoration must be tolerated, but it impacts value and can make an ordinary figure almost valueless. Appearances can be deceiving. Don't be deceived!! A fool and his money are soon parted.

PS.
A dealer wanting a quick fix to make the church marketable might simply have asked a restorer to grind away the remains of the figures and paint the patches on the base green--in this manner, the remains of the lion and unicorn were removed from the armorial container shown in this article.  For this reason, when you buy a figure group, open  books or Google to compare it to other examples and ensure all the elements are in place. 



0 Comments
    Myrna Schkolne, Myrna Bloch Schkolne, antique Staffordshire pottery, expert
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolnecture
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, Ralph Wood, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, Obadiah Sherratt, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    Picture
    antique Staffordshire pottery figure, pearlware figure, Staffordshire figure, creamware, Neale & Co, Wilson, Neale & Wilson,  Myrna Schkolne

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    September 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    February 2024
    November 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008

    All material on this website is protected by copyright law. You may link to this site from your site, but please contact Myrna if you wish to reproduce any of this material elsewhere.


Visit earlystaffordshirefigures.com