Staffordshire Figures 1780-1840
  • Home
  • Books
  • Blog
  • Figures etc.
    • Some Fabulous Figures
    • Restoring Antique Staffordshire Pottery
    • Reproductions of Antique Staffordshire Pottery Figures
    • Believe It?
    • Dealers in Antique Staffordshire Pottery
    • Books on Staffordshire Pottery
    • Interesting Web Sites
  • Videos

The Peter Puzzle

9/11/2012

0 Comments

 
John Walton is perhaps the best know of the early Staffordshire potters, and for good reason.  Walton made more marked figures  than did any other potter of his time. Over 80 marked Walton figure forms are recorded. Runner-up Ralph Salt only made about three dozen.

There are many pairs of figures among the many marked Walton figures. Showman and showwoman, gentleman and lady gardeners, pairs of lions, cows and sheep. You get the drift.  Not surprisingly, both figures in each pair are marked.  This is sounding too easy, is it not?  Here comes the wrinkle: Walton's figures of St. Paul are marked, but companion figures of St. Peter are NEVER marked.  Why?

The more I think about this, the more I wonder whether Walton actually ever made St Peter. St Peter may have been made by some other potter. The features on marked Walton figures (the bocages, decorative sprigs, the color palette) also occur on figures made by other pot banks. So just because there is a companion St Peter does not mean Walton made it. Somebody else may well have done the deed.  

Very many Walton figures seem to stand in pairs that have been together forever, but not so St. Peter and St. Paul. I have never seen what an undeniably original pairing. Perhaps Walton only made St Paul--and some other enterprising potter decided to make St Peter to satisfy a market need.  

Lets look at some figures. 
Picture
To start, here is St Paul marked WALTON on the back. As you see, it has the typical five-leaflet bocage fronds that Walton favored. 


As this figure is marked WALTON, there is no dispute as to who made it. But if it was not marked, the best we could say is that it is "Walton-style."  

Picture
Here is a figure of St Peter, not marked. It is Walton-style, but we can't be certain Walton made it. The five leaflet bocage fronds are the same shape as those on the previous St. Paul. The bocage flowers are different, but Walton used these bocage flowers. Unfortunately for us, several other potters used these bocage fronds and flowers too. 

If this figure stood side by side with a very closely matching St Paul--a true pair--I might just get comfortable attributing it to Walton. But otherwise the best I can say is that it was possibly made by Walton.

Note that the book is open to Luke.

Picture


Here we have a very similar St. Peter. Again, each bocage frond has five leaflets. In fact, they are shaped like the bocage fronds on the previous St. Peter and St. Paul. Their painting is unusual--but I have seen bocage fronds on a Walton figure painted in this manner. I have also seen this painting on bocage fronds from other pot banks. Did Walton make this St Peter? Possibly--but I wouldn't want to bet on it.

Note the book is again open to Luke.

Picture


Our third candidate in the contest to find a Walton St. Peter has a quite different bocage form. Walton made bocages with these broad leaves and these flowers--but so did other potters.  Again, I am not betting that Walton made this figure.

Note that the book is now open to John. Hmm....does that mean that this figure comes from a different pot bank to the previous two figures? 

Picture


The fourth contestant again has a very Waltony look....but don't be deceived. The bocage fronds here each have three leaflets, rather than the five-leaflets on  previous figures.

Not a single marked Walton figure has three-leaflet bocage fronds, so I don't believe that this figure was made by Walton. If the figure had lost its bocage, you might be tempted to attribute it to Walton, but that would be a mistake.

Note that the book is now open to Mark!

Picture


The fifth figure (courtesy of Christies) is very like the previous example. Again, each bocage frond comprises three leaflets. I tend to think that figures with these three-leaflet fronds come from the same source. They link together with other figures to form a large group of unkown origin---but they were not made by Walton.

So if I am right and this figure is from the same pot bank as the previous example, why is the book now open to Luke? 

Picture


The final figure has spectacular, large-leaf bocage fronds not often encountered. This example was photographed in a display case at the Potteries Museum. 

Walton did not use this bocage on a single marked figure, and I don't think any figures with this bocage were made by Walton. Rather, I suspect they come from the same pot bank as the previous two figures with three-leaflet bocage fronds.

The book is now open to Mark. The plot thickens.

I throw up my hands in despair! This blog posting is as unsatisfying to me as it is to you. I simply pose a puzzle. Were ANY of these figures of St. Peter made by Walton?  I think not, but we will never know. Who needs Sudoku when you can contemplate these issues?

A collector has suggested that Walton simply forgot to put the mark on the mold he used for St Peter. That is possible--especially as the mark seems to be integral to the mold. In other words, the mark was made with the figure, and it was not put on afterwards. Assuming there was a problem with the mold, I think it would have been caught and easily corrected as subsequent working molds were created for use.

Is there any feature that is specific to Walton figures?  Yes, there is just one.  The rosette that you see on the center front of the base of this figure of FRIENDSHIP occurs only on marked Walton figures.
Picture
If you want to know more about Walton, you can look here:
  • Under the MAKERS tab on this website. This was my first attempt at sorting out Walton, and it needs to be updated--as does the rest of this site. It is top of my "to do" list for when my book is done.
  • The American Ceramic Circle Journal Vol XVI has my most recent article on Walton. To achieve a consistent style throughout the Journal, this work got edited into mundane nothingness. I find it boring, difficult reading, but the pictures are very pretty, and all the essential material is there.
  • Wait for the next book, due in 2013, I think.

Meanwhile, if you have any thoughts, please share them. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Myrna Schkolne, Myrna Bloch Schkolne, antique Staffordshire pottery, expert
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    Staffordshire figure, Myrna Schkolne, pearlware figure, creamware, bocage figure, antique Staffordshire pottery
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolnecture
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, bocage, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, Ralph Wood, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    antique Staffordshire pottery, Staffordshire figure, Obadiah Sherratt, antique Staffordshire, Myrna Schkolne
    Picture
    antique Staffordshire pottery figure, pearlware figure, Staffordshire figure, creamware, Neale & Co, Wilson, Neale & Wilson,  Myrna Schkolne

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    September 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    February 2024
    November 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008

    All material on this website is protected by copyright law. You may link to this site from your site, but please contact Myrna if you wish to reproduce any of this material elsewhere.


Visit earlystaffordshirefigures.com